I've been playing with p-aminophenol developers again. I found that parodinal + ascorbate + borax (RCB) makes for a fine grain full speed developer. I also found that substituting ascorbate for sulfite in parodinal works too (TCB). However, doing side-by-side tests as a one-shot developer, I find that I need twice as much ascrobate-parodinal as I do sulfite-parodinal to get the same level of activity. This bugs me a bit as ascorbate-parodinal is half as efficient as sulfite-parodinal which means I'm wasting a fair amount of ingredients.
Activity levels aside, the visible difference between the two is the formation of long needle-like crystals in the sulfite version and not in the ascorbate one. I don't know what the crystals are but if they are p-aminophenol that means that sulfite-parodinal is super-saturated while ascorbate-parodinal is not which would explain the difference in activity levels. Could it be that the conversion of acetaminophen to p-aminophenol needs sulfite to complete?
I have nothing against sulfite and it's something I stock anyway as I use it in my fix. I'm just curious about the chemical process here so I can better understand what is going on. I am not a chemist in any way so I'm hoping to learn from others with more knowledge about this.
MM
Dedicated to various alternative processes for developing photograpic film. Focuses on but not reserved to Kaffenol developers.
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Thursday, September 15, 2011
Phenidone-C Divided Developer - Strangeness
I've been toying with the idea of a Phenidone-C divided developer akin to divided D-76 or Diafine. Based on my experience with Phenidone-C so far, I propose the following formula:
Part A
Ascorbic Acid - 80g
Sodium Bicarbonate - 60g
Water - 750mL (make sure all is dissolved and effervescence stops)
Phenidone - 1g
Water to make 1L
Part B
Sodium Hydroxide - 1.45g
Borax - 6.92g
Water to make 1L
Agitate for 5 mins in part A then 5 mins in part B.
I did a quick test with the recipe scaled down to 100mL and use film clips to get an indication of activity. What I expected to happen and what actually happened really surprised me. I expected there to be no visible evidence of development in part A while the ascorbate + phenidone soaked into the emulsion and expected all the development to be visible when in part B. To my surprise, after about 1 min in part A I noticed a slight darkening of the film and after two mins it was nearly black. I thought I was going nuts here as everything I read and experienced showed that you need a higher pH to get decent activity out of Phenidone-C. The time in part A is within range of a normal 8-10 min developer. I thought I may have contaminated part A and increased the pH so I checked it with a calibrated meter and it showed 7.2 ... about what I expected being near neutral. Now this is confusing ... ascorbate developing at a pH of 7.2? I still don't believe it but I ran the same test 3 times with the same result. I have no idea what's going on here and cannot explain it. On the plus side I'm thinking with the really low pH this very concentrated phenidone-c-bicarbonate mix could be an extremely fine grained re-usable developer.
On one hand this really complicates my idea for a two part phenidone-c developer but on the other hand I may have stumbled across a new unexpected developer.
Next step is to actually process film instead of test clips to see real world results. I propose two initial tests, one with just part A for 8 mins and one with part A for 2 mins and part B for 6 mins.
Part A
Ascorbic Acid - 80g
Sodium Bicarbonate - 60g
Water - 750mL (make sure all is dissolved and effervescence stops)
Phenidone - 1g
Water to make 1L
Part B
Sodium Hydroxide - 1.45g
Borax - 6.92g
Water to make 1L
Agitate for 5 mins in part A then 5 mins in part B.
I did a quick test with the recipe scaled down to 100mL and use film clips to get an indication of activity. What I expected to happen and what actually happened really surprised me. I expected there to be no visible evidence of development in part A while the ascorbate + phenidone soaked into the emulsion and expected all the development to be visible when in part B. To my surprise, after about 1 min in part A I noticed a slight darkening of the film and after two mins it was nearly black. I thought I was going nuts here as everything I read and experienced showed that you need a higher pH to get decent activity out of Phenidone-C. The time in part A is within range of a normal 8-10 min developer. I thought I may have contaminated part A and increased the pH so I checked it with a calibrated meter and it showed 7.2 ... about what I expected being near neutral. Now this is confusing ... ascorbate developing at a pH of 7.2? I still don't believe it but I ran the same test 3 times with the same result. I have no idea what's going on here and cannot explain it. On the plus side I'm thinking with the really low pH this very concentrated phenidone-c-bicarbonate mix could be an extremely fine grained re-usable developer.
On one hand this really complicates my idea for a two part phenidone-c developer but on the other hand I may have stumbled across a new unexpected developer.
Next step is to actually process film instead of test clips to see real world results. I propose two initial tests, one with just part A for 8 mins and one with part A for 2 mins and part B for 6 mins.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)